Friday, February 23, 2024

Prophetic Warnings Against Teaching False Doctrine

  (McConkie, Petersen, Clark, Benson)

Compiled by Dennis B. Horne

 

Elder Bruce R. McConkie [self-explanatory letter to a private individual, 1982]:

I have just read for the first time your letter . . . in which you spend six pages presenting the general thesis that [mentions a false doctrine]. As you might surmise I am inundated with a flood of letters and manuscripts which set forth quaint and cranky and bizarre and false doctrines. . . . It is my practice to discard them because I have neither the time nor the inclination to engage in discussions or debates on doctrinal matters of the sort contained in your letter. You have indicated a sincere desire for a response and I think in your case I will make a few comments.

            I assume you know already that your doctrine is false; that the entire thesis you have presented is out of harmony with the teachings of the Church and that you are wresting the scriptures and perverting the quotations from the Brethren. . . .

            My reason for writing you is to say that no wise member of the Church with a sound understanding and a stable testimony would deliberately set forth to use the scriptures and quotations from the Brethren to prove and establish as he supposes, any basic doctrine that is known to be in conflict with the teachings of the Brethren and that has been announced by the Presidency and the Twelve officially as being false. This is a very perilous course to pursue. It is destructive of faith. When such information comes in to the hands of spiritually immature people it can have no effect other than to sow seeds of doubt and uncertainty in their minds.

            You have asked for my reaction to your presentation. I do not see any merit in any presentation that is based on false premises. It is possible to make a seemingly logical presentation “proving” the [various false doctrines mentioned] or almost anything. That is not the real issue. We should spend our time sustaining true principles. A man who knows better is very foolish to present false views. . . .

            Jesus said “Everyone that is of the truth heareth my voice.” (John 18:37.) Among other things this means that true believers accept, by instinct almost, the true doctrines of salvation when they are taught to them. It means they reject, almost by instinct, heresies and false views. Pleas add to what Jesus said the revealed concept that whether teachings are by his own voice or the voice of his servants it is the same. . . .

            This letter is not written to argue the point or discuss the various passages. It is obvious that you have enough background and experience in scriptural exegesis and in researching the statements of the Brethren to figure out for yourself what the doctrine is. This letter is written to give the counsel I have stated. Anyone who has the talent you obviously have for analyzing and presenting a viewpoint, should use your talent in the interests of the Church and not in presenting views contrary to the accepted doctrine. I hope you will do so and that you will take the counsel I have given. Sincerely, Bruce R. McConkie

 

Mark E. Petersen, October 1968 general conference:

 

If man understood his true purpose in life as it is revealed in the gospel, and if he knew the secret of his origin, he could begin to free himself from the shackles of this ignorance.

Who are we?

What is the purpose of our existence?

Can a man who thinks that life came about by chance on a globe that was made by accident have any overlying purpose to guide him?

Can a man who thinks he evolved from the lowest forms of life have any lofty aspirations?

Does the idea that we are descendants of ape-like ancestors inspire us to any great heights of achievement?

The importance of having purpose in life cannot be overstated.

The discovery of an obvious purpose in creation is what now begins to open the eyes of our greatest scientists to the facts of our existence. They are learning that creation could not possibly exist, nor could it have come into being initially, without a definite purpose. These scientists now say they are convinced that creation came by the act of a supreme Intelligence, that he had a purpose in creation, and since he has purpose he therefore must be a person. Furthermore, they tell us that this Creator also had a definite purpose in creating man to be like himself.

Listen to some of them.

Dr. Arthur H. Compton, Nobel Prize winner, writing in the Los Angeles Times, said:

"Where there is plan, there is intelligence, and an orderly unfolding universe testifies to the truth of the most majestic statement ever uttered — 'In the beginning, God. . . .' "

In a volume entitled The Freedom of Man, published by Yale University Press, Sir John Arthur Thomson says:

"We feel compelled — and it is a glad compulsion — to say with the most philosophical of the disciples, 'In the beginning was Mind, and the Mind was with God, and the Mind was God.' "

Alfred G. Fisk, in his book The Search for Life's Meaning, says:

"Just as the ordered structure of the universe implies a creative Intelligence, Architect or Orderer, so a belief in the objectivity or purpose in the universe leads to a belief in a Purposer or Divine Agent who is the source and spring of purpose in the Universe."

Sir Ambrose Flemming, in his Origin of Mankind, wrote: "The ultimate cause of things and events is a selfconscious and personal living Being

Life can only proceed from already living matter. It cannot be derived spontaneously from non-living matter. We can obtain energy only from some source or body already possessing it. It cannot arise spontaneously from nothing. . . . Accordingly we can infer that the Cause which gave rise to our self-consciousness and powers of thought, must have been itself selfconscious and intelligent, or a Thinker.

Hence we may infer that the thought of the Intelligent First Cause was not identical with ours, and therefore this separateness constitutes that First Cause a Person."

Dr. Compton, writing for This Week magazine, said:

"Few scientific men today defend the atheistic attitude. Design in the Universe presumes an intelligence. Evidence points to a Beginner, a Creator of the Universe. A physicist's studies lead him to believe this Creator to be an Intelligent Being. The intelligent God has an interest in and relation to man, and it is reasonable to assume that He would be interested in creating a being intelligent like himself."

Albert Einstein, in his book The World as I See It, says on pages 267-68: "The harmony of natural law reveals an Intelligence of such superiority that compared with it, all the scientific thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection."

Origin and destiny of man

Now, what is the truth about the origin of man? Paul gave it to us: We are the children of God. We are his offspring. We are heirs of God and joint heirs with Jesus Christ. (See Rom. 8:16-17.)

And what does that mean?

It means that we have a mighty purpose in life, which purpose is that we may become like Godl

Jesus commanded us to achieve this purpose, saying: "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect." (Matt. 5:48.)

Then, being children of God, we can see our true destiny. And being thus related to him, as his children, we now see ourselves in an entirely new light — not as the descendants of ape-like creatures living an aimless existence, but as the descendants of Almighty God, with the possibility of becoming like himl

Now we can understand the true place and dignity of man. Now we can see his infinite potential.

As members of the family of God, we can know that he has placed us here on earth in a type of school that will help us to become like him, if we are willing to follow the curriculum.

https://archive.org/details/conferencereport1968sa/page/98/mode/2up

Pres. J. Reuben Clark:

And finally, I will quote the passage from First Corinthians, where Paul, speaking to the backsliding Corinthians, among whom already began to appear what finally became the great apostasy, and complaining about them and their thoughts, he said,

"For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified." (I Cor. 2:2.)

There are all sorts of cults, all sorts of shadings of what we have called Christianity. There is one group of scholars that work insidiously sometimes, pretending Christianity and a belief in Christ, but nevertheless who subtly and insidiously teach us things that do not come within what we understand as Christianity. The position of these has been stated by one scholar thus:

"Christ . . . cannot have been both the same unclouded thinker of the moral sayings and the apocalyptic fanatic of the eschatological passages."

And eschatology is defined as "The doctrine of the last or final things, death, resurrection, immortality, the end of the world, final judgment, and the future state; the doctrine of last things."

These teachers who announce this difference as to the life of the Savior and his teachings, some of them, find place amongst us.

These critics say one of these two, the moral teachings or the eschatology, must be given up as historical and the one chosen to be got rid of is the eschatological. Anything beyond the moral teachings is put in the realm of myth, legend, popular exaggeration, symbolism, allegory, or transference of the miraculous from other departments of tradition into the life of Jesus.

Their standard of elimination is that any "event which lies outside the range of the known laws of Nature," must be disregarded. This destroys the divine origin of Jesus, his miracles, his resurrection, and much of his doctrine. . . .

And Luke says, more shortly than is recorded by the others:

"And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them." (Luke 21:8.)

I think perhaps when we first read these extracts we may think that the Savior is talking primarily of a person, somebody to come to impersonate the Christ and claim to be the Christ. It seems to me, however, from the way in which these records are made and what they say, that the Savior also had in mind anyone who would come and say to you, "This is Christ that I teach; that is Christ that I teach; that is the Christian doctrine." In that sense I think that these scholars about whom I have already read, who would discard everything that they could not account for by the known laws of nature, they are in effect false Christs, for they are telling us that the things that we believe in Christ are myths, tradition, symbolism, allegory; they did not exist.

Now, that kind of a religion, that kind of Christianity would require that we discard all that we know about the Great Council in heaven and what was determined there, because these things lie outside the known laws of nature, as those scholars understand them.

We would have to discard the Fall as being a myth, an allegory, symbolism.

We would have to discard the virgin birth, the divine conception, the very foundation of our religion; that would have to go.

We would have to discard the witness of the Father at the time of the baptism of the Savior; that would go as myth, symbolism, allegory.

We would have to discard practically all of the miracles as not taking place  many. . . .

"And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not:

"For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect.

"But take ye heed: behold, I have foretold you all things." (Mark 13:5-6, 21-23.)

And Luke says, more shortly than is recorded by the others:

"And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them." (Luke 21:8.)

I think perhaps when we first read these extracts we may think that the Savior is talking primarily of a person, somebody to come to impersonate the Christ and claim to be the Christ. It seems to me, however, from the way in which these records are made and what they say, that the Savior also had in mind anyone who would come and say to you, "This is Christ that I teach; that is Christ that I teach; that is the Christian doctrine." In that sense I think that these scholars about whom I have already read, who would discard everything that they could not account for by the known laws of nature, they are in effect false Christs, for they are telling us that the things that we believe in Christ are myths, tradition, symbolism, allegory; they did not exist.

Now, that kind of a religion, that kind of Christianity would require that we discard all that we know about the Great Council in heaven and what was determined there, because these things lie outside the known laws of nature, as those scholars understand them.

We would have to discard the Fall as being a myth, an allegory, symbolism.

We would have to discard the virgin birth, the divine conception, the very foundation of our religion; that would have to go.

We would have to discard the witness of the Father at the time of the baptism of the Savior; that would go as myth, symbolism, allegory.

We would have to discard practically all of the miracles as not taking place

and those that might be accepted would be spoken of as signs. A sign can be a miracle, but not necessarily so. A miracle is a sign, but more than that.

We would have to discard the testimony of the Father, at the time of the transfiguration, that Jesus was his Son.

We would have to discard that great occasion, the raising of Lazarus and the incidents thereof, the reply of the Savior to Martha:

"I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: ,

"And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die." (John 11:2526.) That would have to go into the discard as myth, allegory, symbolism, tradition.

Finally, we would have to discard all that we know about the resurrection and its effect; all of that is gone.

As to all these, and almost countless other matters: be not deceived, believe them not, follow not after the false Christs.

I would like you to appreciate that without the eschatology of the records of the Savior's life, we should have nothing left but husks, moral teachings, and ethics which, if lived, would make us a great people, a humane people, a peaceful people, but would not carry us back into the presence of our Heavenly Father.

In my view, that doctrine is not only sacrilegious, but to me it is also blasphemy, something to be utterly cast away. We have less left after they get through with their discards than the old paganism, for that paganism, the old Greek mythology, did acknowledge and have a kind of worship of divine beings which they conceived; they did believe in them and worship them.

My whole soul rebels against this emasculation of Christianity. Jesus did live. First, there was the great plan in heaven; that did actually occur. All that we know about it took place there. There was the plan; the earth was formed; Adam came; the human family followed. We came here to prove ourselves. Finally, Christ was born in the Meridian of Time. He lived. He taught. He gave instructions. He was crucified. Then on the morning of the third day, he was resurrected, thus bringing to each and every of us the blessings of the resurrection. We all shall be resurrected. All of that has gone for these people to whom I refer. It is myth, tradition, allegory. Be not deceived by them; believe them not; follow not after them.

Then we would have to discard all that transpired in the restoration of the gospel, the Vision of the Father and the Son, the coming forth of the Book of Mormon, the giving of the great commandments which compose our Doctrine and Covenants. We would have to discard the Pearl of Great Price and all that it says.

Now, brothers and sisters, let us be aware of this false Christ, false Christianity which is taking root among some of our intellectuals. Be not deceived, believe it not, follow not after it, as the Lord said in those various records.

I bear my testimony as I have already indicated to the truthfulness of the gospel, to the restoration of its great principles, to the restoration of the priesthood, to the conferring of all of these things upon the Prophet Joseph, to the passing down from the Prophet Joseph through the Presidents of the Church until the present, that our President of the Church, President David O. McKay, has all of the rights and the prerogatives and the powers and authorities that were conferred upon the Prophet Joseph.

I bear you this testimony in soberness. I repeat, my soul cries out against this heresy that is taught by this group of so-called Christians.

 

President Ezra Taft Benson:

Do you have members in your stakes whose lives are shattered by sin or tragedy, who are in despair and without hope? Have you longed for some way to reach out and heal their wounds, soothe their troubled souls? The prophet Jacob offers just that with this remarkable promise: “They have come up hither to hear the pleasing word of God, yea, the word which healeth the wounded soul.” (Jacob 2:8; italics added.)

Today the world is full of alluring and attractive ideas that can lead even the best of our members into error and deception. Students at universities are sometimes so filled with the doctrines of the world they begin to question the doctrines of the gospel. How do you as a priesthood leader help fortify your membership against such deceptive teachings? The Savior gave the answer in His great discourse on the Mount of Olives when He promised, “And whoso treasureth up my word, shall not be deceived.” (JS—M 1:37; italics added.)

The scriptures are replete with similar promises about the value of the word. Do you have members who long for direction and guidance in their lives? The Psalms tell us, “Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path” (Ps. 119:105), and Nephi promises that feasting upon the words of Christ “will tell you all things what ye should do.” (2 Ne. 32:3.)

Are there members of your flock who are deep in sin and need to pull themselves back? Helaman’s promise is for them: “Yea, we see that whosoever will may lay hold upon the word of God, which is quick and powerful, which shall divide asunder all the cunning and the snares and the wiles of the devil.” (Hel. 3:29.)

Success in righteousness, the power to avoid deception and resist temptation, guidance in our daily lives, healing of the soul—these are but a few of the promises the Lord has given to those who will come to His word. Does the Lord promise and not fulfill? Surely if He tells us that these things will come to us if we lay hold upon His word, then the blessings can be ours. And if we do not, then the blessings may be lost. However diligent we may be in other areas, certain blessings are to be found only in the scriptures, only in coming to the word of the Lord and holding fast to it as we make our way through the mists of darkness to the tree of life.

And if we ignore what the Lord has given us, we may lose the very power and blessings which we seek. In a solemn warning to the early Saints, the Lord said this of the Book of Mormon: “Your minds in times past have been darkened because of unbelief, and because you have treated lightly the things you have received—

“Which vanity and unbelief have brought the whole church under condemnation.

“And this condemnation resteth upon the children of Zion, even all.

“And they shall remain under this condemnation until they repent and remember the new covenant, even the Book of Mormon.” (D&C 84:54–57.)

Oh, my brethren, let us not treat lightly the great things we have received from the hand of the Lord! His word is one of the most valuable gifts He has given us. I urge you to recommit yourselves to a study of the scriptures. Immerse yourselves in them daily so you will have the power of the Spirit to attend you in your callings. Read them in your families and teach your children to love and treasure them. Then prayerfully and in counsel with others, seek every way possible to encourage the members of the Church to follow your example. If you do so, you will find, as Alma did, that “the word [has] a great tendency to lead people to do that which [is] just—yea, it [has] more powerful effect upon the minds of the people than the sword, or anything else, which [has] happened unto them.” (Alma 31:5.)

Like Alma, I say unto you, “It [is] expedient that [you] should try the virtues of the word of God” (Alma 31:5), in the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment